Monday, March 15, 2010

"Crazy Heart" Review

Audience: NYT

Jeff Bridges—The Lifeblood of “Crazy Heart”

We go to the movies to get away from reality for a few hours of entertainment. Yet in films like “Crazy Heart,” the gritty, harshness of reality is thrown back in our faces (along with quality dramatic and musical entertainment.) Jeff Bridges plays the washed up country singer Bad Blake with unflinching honesty, revealing the repulsiveness of alcoholism and chain-smoking. Combined with a dash of his usual crowd-pleasing humor, Bridges makes a mediocre movie a masterpiece.

The film follows Blake on his post-success tour as he plays in bowling allies and bars. To capture the filth of Bad Blake’s lifestyle, the cinematography includes frequent close ups on Bridges at his worst moments: drinking bare-chested in a dirty hotel, smoking cigarettes in the glow of a television, and vomiting into the toilet in his underwear.

With all of Blake’s blatant vices, it’s a stretch that the attractive journalist Jean Craddock (Maggie Gyllenhaal) falls for him during an interview for a story. Playful banter between Bridges and Gyllenhaal eventually develops: “This is my serious look” Bridges jokes as Gyllenhaal’s interview takes an intimate turn. But however endearing the dialogue comes across, it doesn’t distract from the cringe worthy physical relationship. The age and body shape discrepancy between the two, not to mention Blake’s perpetual booze breath, makes for an awkward bodily chemistry.

Blake’s relationship with Craddock’s four year old son, Buddy, is more believable, in addition to being a predictable plot device. Blake’ irresponsible inattentiveness while drunk ultimately leads to the end of his relationship with Craddock. Still, the boy and Blake have entertaining interactions, such as Blake pushing Buddy on the swings with one crutch while recovering from a car accident.

A refreshing addition to the film’s dismal outlook are the musical numbers sung by Bridges himself and Colin Farrell as Blake’s old band mate turned country star. Both actors showcase their hidden musical talents while performing foot-tapping soft-sung tunes such as “Fallin’ &Flyin’” and “The Weary Kind,” which went on to win best original song at the Academy Awards.

The film’s rhythm slows towards the end as Blake sobers up. The ending is drawn out and contrived, rushing through the beautiful scenes where a clean Bad Blake strums out melancholy songs on his guitar, dappled in sunlight hitting the back porch.

As a whole “Crazy Heart” is not a memorable story, thin on plot and originality. Yet the richness Jeff Bridges brings to the main character makes the film an emotional ride. Towards the beginning of their relationship, Blake admits to Craddock, “I was never famous for charm.” Nonetheless Bridges plays the flaw riddled character with appropriate humor and feeling, bringing an outstanding realness and likability to the film. Bridges’ performance was appropriately rewarded with a best actor win at the Academy Awards.

Saturday, March 13, 2010

A Different kind of artistic journalism....

I have always appreciated this site and I just wanted to share it with everyone. It is MSN's "The Week in Pictures" and it is a compilation of the world's best photo journalism from around the world. It is a fast and powerful way to get a glimpse of the world at the current moment.
Enjoy!

Link:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/3842331/

Intersting tidbit on Kathryn Bigelow

Even though the Oscar talk is coming to a stand still, Kathryn Bigelow's opens more than just gossipy discussions. Being the first woman to win best director is a landmark of our times, and I like how this article titled "How Oscar found Ms. Right" covers the topic.

I was especially intriguied by the line: "No matter if they’re a source of loathing and laughter, the Oscars matter as a cultural flashpoint, perhaps now more than ever."

Here is the copy and pasted version of the link:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/14/movies/14dargis.html?ref=arts
and here is an attempt to make a clickable link:

Friday, March 12, 2010

Oscars Review: Oscar's Pursuit of Popularity

Audience: Small Alternative arts Magazine read by mostly college students

Oscar’s Pursuit of Popularity

Ten best picture nominations, including an animated film and an overcoming-the-odds football flick. Two hosts for double the laughs. And Miley Cyrus. The eighty-second Academy Awards presentation was unmistakably manufactured to attract a widespread audience. On March 7th, 2010 Steve Martin and Alec Baldwin clumsily hosted a night complete with an in memoriam montage of John Hughes’ movies, an ode to horror films and a presenter panel full of fresh young faces with egos to match the red carpet veterans.

Due to the Oscars’ catering to the masses, it was pleasantly surprising that “The Hurt Locker,” a gritty Iraq war film, came out on top with six Oscars, including best picture. “The Hurt Locker” significantly trumped James Cameron’s mega high-grossing visual show off “Avatar.” However “Avatar” earned its due respect by pulling in three image-related awards: visual effects, art direction and cinematography.

Kathryn Bigelow, Cameron’s ex-wife and his chief award competitor, reeled in best director for “The Hurt Locker,” making history as the first woman to win the award. Directly following her win Bigelow was whisked back on stage when Tom Hanks hurriedly announced the award for best picture. Like Bigelow said, twice, it was “the moment of a lifetime.”

Sandra Bullock, the type-cast leading lady of romantic comedies claimed the award for best leading actress for her performance in "The Blind Side." Although movie connoisseurs were surprised and offended that a down home actress in an inspirational football movie snagged the prize, Bullock’s win was as sincere and heart-warming as the girl-next-door character she usually plays.

In contrast, Jeff Bridges won best actor title with universal enthusiasm from critics and the general public alike for his performance in "Crazy Heart.” His excruciatingly realistic portrayal of a washed up country singer undoubtedly deserved the gold. With giddy shout outs during his acceptance speech and “man” at the end of every sentence, Bridges seemed under the influence of more than just the adrenalin of his win. Or maybe his sober personality naturally resembles the whiskey-laden Bad Blake character.

Similar to the harsh, flaw riddled character that won the gold for Bridges, Mo’Nique won best actress in a supporting role for her performance as an abusive mother in "Precious: Based on the novel 'Push' by Sapphire." Christoph Waltz won best supporting actor for his Nazi character in "Inglourious Basterds." Both Waltz and Mo’Nique deserved the traditional Oscar praise for excelling as an unlikable character.

Unfortunately for the animated film enthusiasts and elementary children, “Up” only soared to win best animated feature film and best original music score, failing to follow through on its best picture nomination. It had as good a run as an animated film can have, but the Academy (fortunately) was unwilling to let the film go the distance against quality live action dramas.

And, on the topic of films full of hot air, “Up in the Air” failed to earn an award, despite all of its nominations and George Clooney’s charming good looks. At least the Academy itself does not play the popularity game.

Wednesday, March 3, 2010

Final Project Draft: Found Object Art

Audience: Progressive, local arts magazine

Found Object Art: A Portrait of Ourselves

Humans are first class innovators, producers and consumers: we live in a world of soft drinks and candy bars, tennis shoes and light bulbs, hair spray and cell phones. But along with these luxuries come the cans, wrappers, boxes, bottles, papers and millions of other junk that gets thrown away, or at best, recycled. Or, even better, gets turned into art.

Our trash and recyclables are so colorful, it’s no wonder it drew the eyes of burgeoning modern artists looking for cheap artistic mediums. However, these once thrifty projects have turned into a global trend, some projects taking on a grand scale that goes beyond settling for quick fix material.

Found art thrives on its universality because everyone can appreciate the ingenuity of reusing everyday objects. People who don’t know much about art can pick apart the materials the artist used and appreciate the innovation of the artist. Additionally, found art is the study of what humans throw away. It can be seen at first as a movement towards “going green” due to the current day trend towards being environmentally friendly. However, if an artist was simply striving to be in on the “green scene” he or she would probably design a “green” graphic T or hold an environmental fundraiser at a gallery opening.

Not to say that found artists are not trying to make a statement about consumerism and excess. Some are. Yet the way these artists make their statement is through the human behavior that affects the environment, rather than jumping on the bandwagon environmental trend, which tends to be a phenomenon of the upper class. Found art is more personable, more representational, speaking to the public through our own foibles. Thus found art can be seen as an anthropological study serving as a work of art.

The internet has changed the art world for the better in terms of publicity. Small town artists now have the chance to display their work in the biggest gallery on the planet—the virtual gallery. For found artists especially, the internet has provided a big break. Websites spread knowledge to people who wouldn’t know about the cutting edge art movements that usually start in large cities. Now such movements spread through the internet like wildfire, creating more recycle artists and more admirers of the trade.

One such website, Recyclart.org, allows artists to share their work online to gain publicity and possible buyers. The site has a clear environmental message, stating that, “The goal of Recyclart.org is to bring you good products that are made from re-cycling, re-using, up-cycling,etc. …we have to see things in a different way and learn how to RE-use, RE-cycle and RE-duce our materials and products consumption in order to decrease our footprint!”

Their contributors are not always as passionate about their environmental message. “Guixot de 8,” a group from a small town near Barcelona, Spain, uses recyclable materials to create toys and games. On their website they claim to travel around the world in a van filled with scrap iron that they convert into elaborate structures with movable parts once they stop in a town square. The group enjoys making the toys and having fun along the way, using scrap iron because it was a readily available, free material.

Another website promoter of recycle artists is Webdesignerdepot.com. They specialize in providing a space for advanced found object artists to show off their stuff. The founders say in their mission statement: “The artists featured here exclusively use recycled and/or trash to make pieces of contemporary art. These artists practice the art of “upcycling”, or literally turning everyday trash into creative treasures.” Again, the term “up-cycling” is used to put found objects above their usual status as junk.

One of the highlights of Webdesignerdepo.com is husband and wife team Tim Noble and Sue Webster. They collect discarded items on the streets of London to create heaps of ordinary trash, unremarkable until a light is shone on the pile to reveal an intricate
silhouette image, usually a depiction of the couple themselves.

Also featured is New Hampshire native and sustainably living artist Tim Gaudreau. In his self-explainably titled piece "Self Portrait as Revealed by Trash: 365 days of photographing everything I threw out" he photographed everything he threw out for a year and collaged the photos in an exhibition that filled multiple rooms of a California gallery. His art is more social commentary than aesthetic product since he actually discards the objects. On the other hand, for artist Jason Mercier a fascination with the discarded objects themselves led to his work in recycle art. He specializes in making mosaic portraits out of unique materials, most notably celebrity portraits out of the celebrity’s own discarded objects. (Check out jasonmercier.com and click on “gallery” to see for yourself!)

For South Korean born artist Jean Shin, found art is all about social commentary. Her biography on her website states: “…her arresting installations reflect the individuals’ personal lives as well as collective issues that we face as a society.” For example, her piece “Chance City” (2009) was comprised of $32,404 worth of discarded "Scratch & Win" losing lottery tickets arranged into a city-like structure similar to a house of cards. He piece “Chemical Balance III” (2009) used thousands of empty prescription pill containers arranged with lights in a chandelier-like fashion. Both pieces comment on the excess and sense of hopelessness in American society. However, when asked about the comment on consumerism that she tries to make through her works, Shin responded: “Maybe just that it exists. My work wouldn't exist if I felt negativity toward that.”

With a more hopeful look at humanity, Shin’s work titled “Celadon Remnants” (2008) is a mosaic made out of broken Korean ceramic and glass. It is located in the heart of a Korean-American community in New York City. Shin intends for it to “speak to the rich, yet fractured, cultural history of the Korean diaspora. The pottery remnants were imported from Icheon, Korea as part of a cultural exchange.”
On a similar note of community building through found art, Kalamazoo College senior

Jenneva Scholz is working on a mosaic for Ministry with Community, a local homeless support shelter. The mosaic will be comprised of unwanted works from ceramic classes and dishes from the Resource Exchange Program at the college and the Salvation Army. She says, “It's a community project, so the members of ministry are actually making the mosaic, and we are coordinating it happening.”

Through the large scale efforts of Jean Shin and the local efforts of Jenneva Scholz, found object art takes on more than a role of depicting wasteful human behavior and offering a message for environmental friendliness. It is a form of community bonding; making something new through everyday objects.

Monday, March 1, 2010

NYT Defense for Wednesday

Due to my fascination with visual art, I was drawn to Holland Cotter’s article from Friday, February 26th, “At a Biennial on a Budget, Tweaking and Provoking.”
Link: http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/26/arts/design/26biennial.html

I was further drawn into the piece by Cotter’s smooth, accessible writing style and his jolting opening phrase about a “pre-emptive effort at damage control.” Cotter’s use of the second and first person draws in the reader, making the art more accessible, rather than estranging someone who may disagree. The “But” comes at the beginning of the fifth paragraph: “But if the museum gets full points for truth in advertising, it can also claim credit for a solid and considered product.”

Cotter lets the art do the talking rather than burdening the piece with critique. He uses wonderful adjectives in the opening of the piece that tie into the title, such as “slight,” “Spartan,” and “hermetic.” I admire the way he related the works of art to each other to convey the overall feel of the exhibit.

Cotter’s authority comes in when he reveals his background research by describing the methods of artists, and from his own extensive art and criticism credentials. He won the 2009 Pulitzer Prize for criticism and has served on the board of directors of the International Association of Art Critics.

Gallery Review: Graphic Art with a Mission

Graphic Art with a Mission

Bright blocks of color and bold text enveloped the towering white walls of the Richmond Center for Visual Arts at Western Michigan University. “The Graphic Imperative” displayed from January 14th through February 19th, 2010 consisted of one hundred twenty one posters spanning forty years of international sociopolitical themes including environmental, anti-war, human rights, literacy, and AIDS awareness.

The eye-catching giants, some six feet high, overwhelmed the spacious gallery. Curators Elizabeth Resnick and Chaz Maviyane-Davies from the Massachusetts College of Art in Boston and Frank Baseman of Philadelphia University stated the initial purpose of these posters is to “jar us to action through bold messages.” But when viewed as art, some remain just concepts and others shine for artistic prowess. The best posters do both.

Some messages sang out loud and clear: Julius Friedman’s “Illiteracy, we all pay the price” (1989) consists of a large black X on white with “This is the way 27 million Americans sign their name” underneath. The simple, stark work makes no room for multiple interpretations, yet eliminates graphic admiration in the process.

Likewise, Swiss artist Niklaus Trokler employed simplicity for “Dead Trees” (1992). The brown half circles representing tree stumps across a neon green background look like something designed in the Microsoft Paint program. But the stumps’ shocking red surfaces turn the scene violent, shouting environmental destruction with one glance.

Alternatively, some artists valued artistry over message. Two pieces from the Endangered Species poster series started by a 1975 student strike workshop at Massachusetts College of Art employ large caricatures of animals. “Endangered Giant Panda” (1982) and “Endangered Cuban Crocodile” (1985) seem like children’s story book illustrations, their friendly colors masking any sense of endangerment even with the word “endangered” on both pieces.

The artists that paired creative graphics with a powerful message elicited the largest emotional responses, some using similar methods for shock value. Two artists working thirty years apart represented inadvertent human destruction with interlocking biting figures. In “Hunger Crime” (1998) by Luba Lokova a series of personified drumsticks bite the bone of the adjacent one with vicious looks their eyes. In Tomi Urgerer’s “Black Power, White Power”(1967) two skeletal figures—identical except for their color— fit together like tessellations as they bite the foot of the other, symbolizing race relations in the late 1960s.

In another bold piece, “Lipstick” (1972), Cuban artist José Gómez Fresquet created in his words, a “jarring interplay between the realities of two women” using only four colors. The silhouette of a white woman outlined in black puckers her lips for lipstick, while a woman’s yellow face comes from the right hand darkness, blood dripping from her nose out of the same vibrant red as the lipstick.

These public service posters are usually seen first for their message and secondly, if at all, seen for design. By showing the posters in a gallery, “The Graphic Imperative” exhibition opened the door for appreciating the ingenuity behind effective message driven art.